Thursday, 5 September 2013

No Weigh to Live - Nutrition in New Zealand Schools


New Zealand has long had a strong sporting culture and boasts a number of the top athletes on the international stage. This emphasis on sport is not only for an elite level, but also has a strong influence within New Zealand schools. In fact the Labour party presented the idea that physical education be a compulsory subject here.

With this in mind, it is difficult to understand how New Zealand has one of the highest rates of obesity in the world. Therefore with this investigation I am going to look at the other main factor in the cause of weight gain, nutrition. My argument will be:

Nutrition should be a compulsory subject in all New Zealand secondary schools




New Zealand is currently facing two major issues when it comes to nutrition in schools. The first being the obesity epidemic that the country is facing. 28% of adults in New Zealand are considered obese. Although smoking is currently the number one cause of preventable death in New Zealand, that is likely to change as “obesity looks likely to surpass smoking as the main risk factor for death and disease in New Zealand within three years” (Radio New Zealand, 2013)

On the other end of the scale, many New Zealand children are suffering from not having enough food. Many teachers in New Zealand have showed their concern for the amount of children going to school hungry. This can then lead onto children struggling to focus on their schoolwork and puts their future at risk as explained in this investigation.



In both situations, obesity and malnutrition, can cause serious health issues.

The major health risks of obesity are well publicized across the media, with factors including heart disease, type two diabetes and cancer. There are also less obvious implications which sufferers of obesity encounter. Mental disorders are connected to obesity including ADHD and depression. Obesity sufferers can also struggle with social issues through lack of confidence, insecurities and low self-esteem. All of these issues combine to threaten the well being of the general public, but their implications can wreak havoc on the development of children.

Although obesity too can be attributed with malnutrition, because people are eating the wrong foods, which limits their nutritional intake, but there are also many children in New Zealand going hungry. As with obesity, malnutrition can also threaten the growth and potential of children. They are often left feeling low in energy, which can decrease their brain function, including their memory capacity. Malnutrition also damages a person’s immune system, which puts them at a greater risk to other health issues such a pneumonia and tuberculosis.

There is also concern over the medical bill this is costing the country. As previously mentioned, there are a number of health risks associated with both obesity and malnutrition. Although these affect individuals differently, they are also costing the New Zealand taxpayers in general. Research completed at Auckland University found that “obesity in New Zealand costs the country between NZ$722 million and NZ$849 million a year in health care costs and lost productivity” (University of Auckland, 2012). Because of this being such a high cost, it demonstrates how much the country could save in the long term if money is spent on prevention rather than treatment.



With this in mind, it is clear that both of these health problems are serious issues that need to be treated. Fortunately in most cases, both of these can be preventable.

When it comes to children in particular, they are not the ones choosing what food they do or do not eat, instead their parent’s do it for them.  “As a parent you have an important role in shaping your child’s dietary habits. You can control what, when and how your child eats, as well as being a role model” (New Zealand Nutrition Foundation, 2009).  One reason given for the poor nutrition is that parents are unaware of what the right foods are to feed their children. Without the right education, parents are unknowingly putting their children’s health at risk.

Cost is also a huge contributing factor when it comes to nutrition in New Zealand. Without the knowledge of how to prepare healthy meals, trying different options can be expensive and time consuming. Therefore people tend to stick to the staple meals they are used to making, which in turn continues their cycle of poor health. In order to improve this situation there are eating programmes and classes to teach people healthier cooking options, but these too cost in both money and time.

Because of this situation, there is a need to teach people how to prepare healthier options with a focus on affordability. As school is compulsory in New Zealand up until the age of 16, by having nutrition as a school subject, it would mean that everyone has the opportunity to learn about healthy eating without having to take time out of their work schedule or pay any extra fees.



To summarise, by having nutrition as a compulsory subject in New Zealand schools would impact positively on not only individuals but also the general population as well. With everyone having the chance to learn about how to have a healthy lifestyle, we would be able to prevent the ever-increasing rise of obesity in New Zealand. This would give individuals a better over-all quality of life without the ailments that arise from poor eating choices and it would also cut costs in the expensive medical bill New Zealand is currently paying to the costs.

References


English, C. (2013, May 29). Obesity crisis 2013: Is the American diet causing mental disorders [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.policymic.com/articles/45033/obesity-crisis-2013-is-the-american-diet-causing-mental-disorders

New Zealand Nutrition Foundation. (2009). Maintaining a healthy body weight. Retrieved September 28, 2013 from http://www.nutritionfoundation.org.nz/nutrition-facts/maintaining-a-healthy-bodyweight/children

Radio New Zealand. (2013). Obesity on track to be main health risk. Retrieved September 28, 2013 from http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/216544/obesity-on-track-to-be-main-health-risk

Strauss, R. (2000). Childhood obesity and self-esteem. Pediatrics, 105(1), pp. 1-5. Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/105/1/e15.full


Wednesday, 4 September 2013

My Comments


Mille – Music in Schools

Hi, I'm interested on your view about a child being 'forced' to learn music, do you think they will grow to love it from being made to play or do think it'll make them hate it even more? I learnt piano for 8 years and loved it but couldn't imagine having to do all the hard work had I not enjoyed it! Well done on your blog anyway, you've presented a really well informed argument.

Amy-Claire – Animal Testing

Wow, the things they do is just awful. Good use of the pictures, it really emphasises the reality of the situation and in turn strengthens your argument, nice work.

Leonella – Is childhood obesity a parent’s responsibility?

Hi Leonella, I did my blog on obesity as well but instead looked at how nutrition in schools might improve the situation. I like your idea of looking into the parents responsibility in the situation, I found a really interesting quote on it:
As a parent you have an important role in shaping your child’s dietary habits. You can control what, when and how your child eats, as well as being a role model” (New Zealand Nutrition Foundation, 2009)
It makes it pretty obvious the influence they have on their child's health, right?
Nice work.

Akosita – Should homosexuals be allowed to adopt?

Hi Akosita,
You've taken on a very controversial and topical subject and have done a really good job. I like the different angles you have taken such as the human rights topic, it really emphasises your point. You might just want to put the references section at the end of your page so it is more logically set out though. Otherwise, nice work.

Monique – Photoshop, an angel in disguise?

Hi Monique,
I completely agree with you on this subject and it is a very topical issue to address. I can appreciate how you consider the use of retouching near your conclusion but I don't know whether that might take away a little bit from your argument? Irrespective of that, the information you have provided is very thought provoking and your links help to solidify your point well so nice work.